Sex has been a taboo subject for a very long time and there are numerous reasons for keeping it taboo….such as religious dogma, ‘morality’
issues and suppression of the pleasure centres from the blatant lies and fabrications surrounding the body’s natural functioning.
There has been so much ignorance about sex generally that unfortunately the foreskin has been a casualty of this deliberate agenda
of misinformation propaganda and brainwashing. Derogatory terms mocking intact men or their foreskins are numerous and names such
as anteater, aardvark, lace curtain, turtleneck sweater, carrot (as opposed to mushroom), elephant’s trunk, snozzle have all been
used to ‘torment’ uncircumcised men by their ‘normalised’ circumcised peers. Being categorised as either a “roundhead” (circumcised)
or “cavalier” (uncircumcised) has in the past been a significant part of people’s lives in societies where circumcision was carried
out.
The judgemental attitudes of some people can be incredibly negative, hostile, demeaning and damaging towards the owners of foreskins
because of ancient prejudices and more recent perpetuated twisted belief systems, which can no longer be allowed to influence modern
civilized life. Both men and women need to stop tormenting uncircumcised men over agendas started so long ago that all objectivity
has been lost because the foreskin is a miraculous piece of apparatus and it needs to be promoted as such, so there needs to be no
more derision and hostility towards the uncircumcised.
If all non-Jewish and non-Moslem men were left uncircumcised then those societies who must circumcise to identify each other would
be left as the only circumcised humans. The Jews and Moslems (and the other communities or tribes who circumcise culturally) would
then stand alone in this unethical and abhorrent sexual fascism practice. This may prompt them to most seriously review or re-assess
their archaic, barbaric and torturous practice, as the rest of the civilised ‘intact’ world looks on in bewilderment at the heinous
sexual violation and human rights issues. To cut off a child’s pleasure centre and mutilate their genitals without any consent whatsoever
IS an abusive crime of the most cowardly kind and it is a odious practice of marking the ‘sheep’ to identify members of their flock.
Surely there can be other less traumatising ways to identify each other that does not cause torturous pain through genital mutilation.
The majority of men and women who do appreciate and value the wonders of the foreskin thankfully are predominantly the bulk of the
planet’s population.